Human decides Onboarding

Probation Review Preparation Agent

A probation review preparation agent is an AI agent for onboarding that tracks probation milestones and jurisdiction-specific notice deadlines, reminds the manager and HR well ahead of each one, and assembles the manager's own notes, the agreed plan and check-in records into a structured template for the review conversation.

How does the probation review preparation agent work?

What flows in, what the agent does with it, where a person decides, and what comes out.

  1. Reads from

    Probation dates and notice rules · Manager's plan and check-in notes · Employee's own updates, if shared · Country letter templates

  2. AI agent · runs when a probation milestone or notice deadline approaches

    Probation Review Preparation Agent

  3. A person decides

    Manager and HR decide confirm, extend or end probation

  4. Produces

    Deadline alerts to manager and HR · Manager's prep pack for the review meeting · Draft letter only after the decision is logged

What does the probation review preparation agent do?

Tracks probation milestones and jurisdiction-specific notice deadlines, reminds the manager and HR well ahead of each one, and assembles the manager's own notes, the agreed plan and check-in records into a structured template for the review conversation.

What does it produce?

Deadline alerts, a prep pack for the manager, and after the human decision a draft confirmation or extension letter for HR to check.

Who decides?

The manager and HR decide whether to confirm, extend or end probation. The AI never scores the new hire, never recommends an outcome, and never drafts anything until the human decision is recorded.

What systems does the probation review preparation agent connect to?

Examples of the kind of systems this agent would read from or write to, so you can picture it in your own stack. The actual set is whatever you run.

  • HRIS

    contract and probation dates

    WorkdaySAP SuccessFactorsPersonioHiBob
  • Documents / e-signature

    templates and letters

    DocuSignMicrosoft 365Google Workspace
  • Chat / calendar

    reminders

    SlackMicrosoft TeamsGoogle Calendar

What data does it need?

  • probation start and end dates by contract and jurisdiction
  • the 30-60-90 plan and check-in records the manager chose to keep
  • letter templates by country

How would you measure it?

probation reviews held on time, monthly, by entity; deadline alerts issued and acknowledged; HR hours per probation case

What does a first proof look like?

Run it against upcoming probation end dates in one entity. HR checks every alert against the contract and jurisdiction rule; managers use the prep pack in real reviews.

You'd call it working when

No deadline is missed or mis-calculated, the pack holds only what the manager chose to keep, and no letter appears before a decision is recorded.

What usually goes wrong?

  • Notice rules differ by country and contract; a wrong rule is worse than no reminder.
  • The prep pack drifts into a summary that reads like an assessment.
  • A letter drafted before the decision, which looks like a pre-judged outcome.

What are the guardrails?

  • Never scores the employee or suggests an outcome.
  • No letter is drafted until the human decision is logged.
  • Works council or employee representatives consulted before launch where required.
  • Uses only records the manager chose to keep; no message or activity data.
  • Data minimized to dates, plan and check-in notes; deleted per the retention rule.

What leaves your boundary is set per build; the inputs above are the ceiling, and where the model runs, what it retains, and the DPA are agreed with your security team before anything is connected.

Our read

Human decides sensitivity high Order: once trust is earned

The job itself is a decision about a named person. This agent exists as decision support only; the decision stays with the person named above.

Some suites offer this as an automated decision. We do not build it that way: the agent prepares, a named person decides, and the record shows who.

An individual employment decision with legal deadlines and works-council interest

Where it sits in the order

An individual employment decision with legal deadlines; build after the team trusts the earlier agents.

Is a Probation Review Preparation Agent worth building for your function?

That depends on your numbers, your data, and what else is on the map for you. The strategy month works that out.

How the strategy month works

Book a call

Thirty minutes. Bring the number this would move.