Greenhouse Voice AI

Voice AI is Greenhouse’s first-round interview. It runs inside Greenhouse Recruiting, or on its own if you use a different hiring system. Candidates answer by video when it suits them. A recruiter reviews every score before anyone is rejected. Greenhouse publishes no price and bills by headcount. It makes no uptime promise for Voice AI. Writing the candidate notice is your job, not Greenhouse’s.

In one line

Voice AI is the first-round interview. It runs inside Greenhouse Recruiting or on its own. Your team writes the questions, and a person reviews every score before anyone moves on.

Switch it on if

Your candidate records are in Greenhouse Recruiting. You want the score, the transcript and the recording to land on the candidate record your team already opens.

Leave it off if

You need an uptime promise in writing. You cannot give candidates notice, before they start, that the interview is recorded on video. Or you need a price you can work out from your applications, not your headcount.

Price

Not published. Greenhouse bills Voice AI every year, by your company’s headcount rather than by seat.

Voice AI is a recorded interview that a recruiter must approve

Greenhouse’s own Voice AI terms call this an AI-conducted video interview. The candidate answers your team’s questions and gets follow-up questions based on what they say. They can also raise questions back about the role, and the answers come only from material your team approved. Voice AI runs in eleven languages. They are English, Hindi, two kinds of Spanish for Latin America and Spain, Brazilian Portuguese, German, French, Italian, Russian, Dutch and Japanese.

Your recruiters and hiring managers set the questions before any candidate is interviewed. They also write the scoring guide and the context for the role. They can later tune the scoring to match what they expect. The questions and the guide are your team’s own work. What comes back depends on the hours someone spends writing them.

Every interview returns a recording, a transcript and one overall score, with some questions counting more than others. It also returns a score for each question, weighed against your guide. A written explanation quotes the candidate’s own answers. If a candidate’s behaviour looks inconsistent, Voice AI marks the exact moment it happened.

Voice AI records audio and video, but it scores only the transcript. The terms rule out several other things. Voice AI may not read a candidate’s emotion, sentiment or mood. It may not guess a candidate’s personality from their voice. It may not read a candidate’s emotional or mental state from their tone, face, eyes or pauses. The terms also rule out biometric identification, so no voiceprint or faceprint is taken. They also rule out using audio, video or facial data to guess a protected characteristic. That is a trait the law says employers cannot use to judge someone. Reading someone’s emotions during a job interview has been banned in the EU since 2 February 2025.

The score is only a recommendation. Greenhouse’s Voice AI terms forbid you from using it as the only reason for any employment decision. That covers advancing a candidate, rejecting them, ranking them, screening them out, scheduling them or making them an offer. Greenhouse’s support pages also say Voice AI does not make an automated decision under Article 22 of the GDPR. That is the EU’s data protection law. Article 22 is the rule for decisions made about a person with nobody involved. In practice, a recruiter has to open every result.

The same terms give your team two jobs. First, every candidate must get clear notice before a session starts. It must say an AI is interviewing them and that their audio and video are recorded. It must also say that AI scores a transcript and that a person makes the final call. It must say the candidate can request a different process, or their own data. Second, anyone who says no must be offered a fair alternative. So must anyone who needs a change for a disability or their religion. They cannot be penalised for it. Your team writes the notice and runs the alternative, and keeps both up to date as the law changes.

The results land wherever your candidate records already sit. Jobs move from your tracking system into Voice AI automatically. The score, the transcript, the explanation and any opt-out all land on the candidate’s record in that system. Voice AI works deepest inside Greenhouse Recruiting. Three features work only there. It can choose which rejection email goes out. It keeps deletion dates in step between the two systems. Greenhouse Recruiting also has its own page built just for Voice AI.

Our guide to AI interview agents compares it with the rest of the market.

Voice AI already has a monthly bias audit and the compliance paperwork

Cheat and fraud flags never change the score

Voice AI watches for signs that a candidate is getting outside help. It marks the exact moment in the transcript. A separate check flags résumé fraud before a recruiter sees it. Neither flag changes the score. A recruiter sees the flag first, and only a recruiter can act on it.

An outside audit tests it for bias every month

Warden AI, an outside firm, audits Voice AI every month, listed as Greenhouse’s “AI Interviewer”. Greenhouse publishes the result on a public page anyone can view. New York City’s law only requires an audit once a year, so this is more often. The latest sample covered 65,880 interviews. The dashboard shows 102 results marked “Clear”, and none marked “Consider” or “Concern”. Warden AI updates its dashboard live, so the numbers may be different by the time you look. The audit measures the tool against four laws. They are New York City’s Local Law 144, the EU AI Act, a Colorado bill and California’s fair employment law. Greenhouse’s own AI principles page says the audit covers ten protected classes.

Greenhouse already holds the security and privacy paperwork

Two outside audits cover Greenhouse every year. SOC 1 Type 2 covers its money controls. SOC 2 Type 2 covers its security controls. Greenhouse also holds three certificates. ISO 27001 covers information security. ISO 27701 covers privacy. ISO 42001 covers managing AI systems. Greenhouse says it does not use your data to train its own AI or any other company’s AI. The Voice AI terms go further. Nobody may reuse your recordings, transcripts or scores for anything else, including training AI.

Candidates can opt out, and most rate it well

The terms require you to offer an alternative, so a candidate can opt out. Greenhouse’s own figures put candidate ratings at 4.5 out of 5. 90% rate the experience 4 or 5 stars. 10% choose not to take it. Greenhouse also says the interview notes tie to the skills your team set. That gives a recruiter a clear reason to share when a candidate does not go through.

It makes no uptime promise, and setup takes real time

Greenhouse Software, Inc. is private. It was founded in 2012 and is based in New York City. TPG Growth and The Rise Fund became its majority investor in a deal announced on 14 January 2021. No layoffs, sale or shutdown have been reported.

The product itself is newer. Ezra AI Labs was founded in 2024. Greenhouse announced its deal to buy Ezra on 5 May 2026 and completed it on 27 May 2026. Ezra’s founder, Ophir Samson, joined Greenhouse as Head of Voice AI. Greenhouse says Ezra is still available on its own, both to Greenhouse customers and to companies on other platforms.

Voice AI is two years old, and it came to Greenhouse through a purchase. It could be renamed, rebuilt or folded into something else during your contract. Get clear on what happens then to your recordings, your questions and your scoring guides. Confirm who pays for that work.

Greenhouse only promises its best effort on Voice AI uptime

Greenhouse’s main contract covers uptime for most of its product, but not for Voice AI. For Voice AI, Greenhouse only promises to try its best. Greenhouse also warns the tool may get things wrong. Transcripts may contain errors. Scores may carry bias, from the training data or from the scoring guide your team wrote. The product may also be harder to use for some people with disabilities. Decide now what your recruiters should do if a candidate is halfway through an interview when it stops.

Setup starts with a support ticket and a build in Ezra

Greenhouse’s own setup guide says you must open a support ticket first. Greenhouse then connects you with its Account Services team before anything is set up. Each interview must first be set up in Ezra, the product Voice AI grew out of. Only then can you choose it in Greenhouse. An interview not yet set up there will not appear in the list. Plan the first role as a week of someone’s time, not an afternoon. Decide now who owns that setup work once the person who did it changes jobs.

A connection to another tracking system is yours to maintain

Greenhouse takes no responsibility if a link to another tracking system breaks or goes wrong. Name one person to review that connection every month. Keep that review on your compliance list, not in someone’s memory.

Greenhouse names five laws that may apply to you

Greenhouse’s own support pages expect Voice AI to be classed as a high-risk AI system under the EU AI Act. That applies when you use it to judge candidates for a job. Those duties start on 2 December 2027. The same pages name five laws you may fall under by using Voice AI. They are the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act, New York City’s Local Law 144, California’s rules on automated decisions, the EU AI Act and Ontario’s Working for Workers Four Act. Have your lawyer compare that list against every place you hire, before you sign.

It fits best if Greenhouse already runs your hiring

If your candidate records are in Greenhouse Recruiting

The features that work only inside Greenhouse Recruiting apply here. Your recruiters stay in one place. There is no second candidate record for anyone to reconcile.

Zapier saved 228 recruiter hours on senior technical roles

Zapier put the interview at the start of the application, instead of after it. Candidates complete a 25 minute conversation to finish applying. Over 75 days, on senior technical roles, Zapier ran 273 of these conversations. 97% of candidates rated the experience excellent. 6% chose not to take it. Zapier says it saved 228 hours of recruiter time.

Voice AI interviewed 200 applicants a recruiter would have skipped

Greenhouse publishes one worked example, without naming the customer. 500 people applied. Voice AI interviewed 200 who would otherwise have been passed over. 19 went back to a recruiter. 17 cleared that review. 5 reached the final round. 1 was hired. Before the call, work out how many recruiter reviews your own volume would create.

It works standalone, on 60 or more other tracking systems

Voice AI is sold on its own, as well as inside Greenhouse. Bought alone, it needs no other Greenhouse subscription. Named systems include ADP Workforce Now, Ashby, iCIMS, Lever, Oracle Recruiting Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, SmartRecruiters, UKG, Workday and Teamtailor. Greenhouse names 60 or more in total.

Greenhouse prices Voice AI by headcount, not by interview

Greenhouse publishes no price for Voice AI. It sells Voice AI as a yearly subscription. The price is set by your company’s headcount, or by the headcount of the team you scope it to. Greenhouse’s wider subscription works the same way. That headcount includes any affiliate company you give access to.

Settle how many interviews that price covers before you sign. Greenhouse calls this a “generous fair-use allowance of interviews sized to your expected volume.” Bring your busiest month to that conversation, not your average one. Confirm what happens in a month you go past it.

The commitment runs at least a year. A pilot is not a separate short contract. It is an opt-out window inside that year-long agreement. Get that window, and the date it closes, written into your order form. Under Greenhouse’s main contract, your subscription renews for another year automatically, unless either side gives 30 days’ written notice. Greenhouse must warn you at least 60 days before a renewal, if your term is a year or longer. Greenhouse can also raise its fees at renewal, with no cap written down.

Greenhouse publishes no minimum company size or hiring volume to buy Voice AI. It markets Voice AI for the first screen when many people apply. The two companies it names as customers are Zapier and Clover Health.

Voice AI keeps the audio, video, transcripts and scores for as long as your contract runs. You can delete them sooner. A deletion request is carried out within 30 days. Greenhouse ties that figure to the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act. This includes requests candidates send you. Even after deletion, the data sits in a backup for 30 more days. When your agreement ends, all your data is queued for deletion 90 days later. During your contract, you can export everything yourself, at no cost. Request an export after your contract ends instead, and Greenhouse can charge its data migration rates at the time. If Greenhouse is not your main hiring system, moving what you want to keep is your job alone. Greenhouse has no duty to keep your data reachable once those 90 days pass. That is true whether or not you finished moving it.

You could also build a screen, an interview and a debrief on your own tracking system. We have mapped what that looks like. See it as an agent

What should you ask before you switch this on?

  1. How long do you keep our recordings, and can we shorten that in writing? Good answer: A retention period shorter than the full contract term, in the order form.
  2. Which companies outside Greenhouse hear our candidates’ interviews, and where do they hold that data? Good answer: A named list of companies, and the countries where each stores data.
  3. Voice AI has no uptime promise. Will you add one to our order form? Good answer: A written uptime commitment and support hours, added to the order form.
  4. What wording do you give us for the candidate notice, and who updates it? Good answer: A notice template Greenhouse updates, not one your own team tracks alone.
  5. How many interviews does our price cover, and what happens once we pass it? Good answer: A written number, and a fixed price for every interview after it.
  6. Is the rise in our fees at renewal capped at all? Good answer: A cap written into the contract, not left open.
  7. Will you give us our own audit data, so we can meet our duty in New York City? Good answer: Yes, our own audit data, not just Greenhouse’s overall dashboard.
  8. When we leave, what comes out, and what does it cost if we ask after the contract ends? Good answer: The recordings, transcripts, scores and questions, at no charge, if we ask before the contract ends.

Metaview Screening, Ribbon, HeyMilo or HireVue, or buy nothing

Four other products sit near this decision, and buying nothing is a fifth option. Metaview Screening, Ribbon and HeyMilo are all sold on their own. They charge by interview, not by headcount. HireVue is different. It comes as part of a wider hiring platform, with a longer buying process.

Put Ribbon beside Voice AI if you want a price you can see. Ribbon’s plans start at $499 a month for 100 interviews. It charges $4.00 an interview for every interview after that. You can work out your own bill from your applicant numbers before you speak to anyone. Ribbon means another supplier, another contract and another place for your recruiters to watch. Voice AI lands on the record they already have open.

Look at Metaview if you want a smaller first step. It charges for each finished interview, and lets a new account try some interviews free before billing starts. One role will show you, inside a fortnight, whether your recruiters will actually use it.

The last option is to leave the first round with your recruiters, for now. Voice AI is worth its cost only once your application volume is genuinely high. If your recruiters are keeping up with their screens, this may not be worth it yet. The same is true if a role draws dozens of applicants rather than hundreds. You would take on the notices, the alternative process and all the reviews, for very little back. Some legal duties stay with you either way. Under New York City’s Local Law 144, the audit and notices fall to the employer, not the vendor. Britain’s new rules on automated decisions came into force on 5 February 2026. Our market guide works through the case for buying nothing in more detail.

Sources and method Everything said about Greenhouse Voice AI here comes from Greenhouse’s own product pages, legal terms, support articles, AI principles and security pages, its newsroom and its Zapier customer story, from the public bias-audit dashboard its own pages link to, from named press coverage of its ownership, and from the public court record. What Greenhouse publishes about its own product is taken as its description of that product. Every source was read on 19 September 2026, and quotations are verbatim. Where Greenhouse’s marketing pages and its Voice AI terms describe the interview differently, we state what the terms say is recorded, because the terms are the contract and the more specific statement, and put the rest to Greenhouse as a question. The figures on the bias-audit dashboard are live and keep moving; they are given as they stood when it was read. Two pages on Ezra AI Labs’ own trust site would not render as text, and nothing from them is used here.

https://www.greenhouse.com/voice-ai-interviewing · Greenhouse Voice AI product page · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.greenhouse.com/product-features/voice-ai-now-works-with-60-ats-platforms · Voice AI and other tracking systems, September 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.greenhouse.com/voice-ai-terms · Voice AI Terms, 26 May 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.greenhouse.com/master-subscription-agreement · Greenhouse Master Subscription Agreement, 1 February 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.greenhouse.com/ai-terms · Greenhouse AI Terms, 1 February 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.greenhouse.com/ai-principles · Greenhouse AI principles · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.greenhouse.com/security · Greenhouse trust and security, certifications · read 19 Sep 2026
https://support.greenhouse.io/hc/en-us/articles/55090273099803-Voice-AI-Data-Processing-FAQ · Voice AI data processing FAQ, 28 August 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://support.greenhouse.io/hc/en-us/articles/45440593896091-Voice-AI-integration · Voice AI setup instructions, 9 September 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://trust.warden-ai.com/greenhouse/ai-interviewer · Warden AI assurance dashboard for Greenhouse’s AI Interviewer · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.greenhouse.com/customer-stories/zapier-conversational-application-voice-ai · Zapier customer story, 5 August 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.greenhouse.com/newsroom/greenhouse-has-entered-into-a-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-ezra-ai-labs · Greenhouse newsroom, 5 May 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.greenhouse.com/newsroom/greenhouse-completes-acquisition-of-ezra-ai-labs-bringing-conversational-ai-to-the-hiring-process · Greenhouse newsroom, 27 May 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.greenhouse.com/llms.txt · Greenhouse company file for AI readers, July 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.ezrarecruiting.com/terms · Ezra AI Labs terms and conditions, 15 October 2025 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://hrtechfeed.com/greenhouse-software-accepts-major-investment-from-tpg-growth/ · HR Tech Feed, TPG Growth majority investment, 14 January 2021 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.alleywatch.com/2021/01/greenhouse-job-recruitment-platform-acquired-tpg-growth/ · AlleyWatch, size of the TPG deal and Greenhouse’s funding to that date, January 2021 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.660082/gov.uscourts.nysd.660082.1.2.pdf · Complaint exhibit, patent case 1:26-cv-02285, Southern District of New York, 19 March 2026 · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.usaspending.gov/search · USAspending.gov award search, no contract naming Greenhouse Voice AI · read 19 Sep 2026
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689 · EU AI Act, Article 5, inferring emotion at work · read 19 Sep 2026
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32026R1744 · EU AI Act as amended, when high-risk duties start for employment systems · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.nyc.gov/site/dca/about/automated-employment-decision-tools.page · New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, automated employment decision tools · read 19 Sep 2026
https://web.archive.org/web/20260904114636/https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2026/82/regulation/2/made · UK rules on automated decision-making, commencement · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.ribbon.ai/pricing · Ribbon pricing · read 19 Sep 2026
https://www.ribbon.ai/pricing · Ribbon pricing, what it charges past the plan’s interviews · read 19 Sep 2026